0

I understand the usefulness and convenience of a site like backblaze, but if I wanted an offline backup and my drive is under 100gb, would it make sense to just make an encrypted full disk dmg image of my main drive every once in a while and put on something like google drive which is a couple bucks a month for 100 gigs storage?

In case local backups aren't working (unlikely) I could use another computer to grab the file onto a thumb drive, and restore the image from disk utility recovery and it should work?

Could the usb with the dmg be ntfs or exfat coming from windows, or would it have to be hfs+ or apfs for disk util to see it?

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

Firstly, I think this depends on your personal price sensitivity, and factors like desire, or expectation for single file restoration, and tracking deleted files, as well as your internet connection. This is a fundamentally subjective and opinion based question.

Yes, you could image and save the whole image every month, but that comes with several drawbacks:

  • Backblaze is 'only' $4 more per month - this is dependent on your price sensitivity.
  • You have to remember to do it (although this could probably be automated, that's an investment of your time and energy). Something like CarbonCopyCloner will give you drive image back-ups.
  • You only get monthly point-in-time restoration. If your drive dies tomorrow (or you lose local back-ups), you're losing a month of data.
  • Backblaze gives you the ability to restore files from anywhere.
  • Backblaze gives you the ability to restore individual files quickly and easily
  • Uploading a whole drive every month could be taxing / time consuming on your internet connection.

To directly answer the questions in the title:

  • Necessary - this is entirely dependent on your risk tolerance and highly subjective. My personal opinion - backup everything that's personal to you (ie. can't be replaced), regardless of size.
  • Easier, no, Backblaze you set and forget and it uploads files every time they change. It's about as easy a solution as you can possibly get.

Backblaze is not your only option though:

  • iCloud will give you all your Documents off-site, and integrates into iOS and macOS so that it's as easy as Backblaze
  • Something like Arq allows you to backup to many different cloud providers - eg. AWS S3, and include Google Drive as a target option.
Improve this answer
3
  • thanks for reply, I know it's $2 vs $6 but I'm pretty poor at the moment, and time machine is running nearly all the time, doing what backblaze would but local, and I make clones regularly, and have icloud sync, I am doing the trial period of ccc but will probably buy soon, it's pretty nice software, so I think I will make .sparseimage of the whole drive and and upload to google one maybe once a week, a bit more work but that's worth the price savings to me. Didn't know about arq, will look into it for snapshots option, vs whole system, I do have some extra room in my google one, but not much.
    – Toddd
    Commented Sep 7, 2020 at 14:04
  • @GGarrett2 - I totally agree, the cost is entirely up to you to assess and together Time Machine and iCloud do a great job keeping your files safe locally and remotely. Just trying to lay out what I think are the options for you.
    – Alex
    Commented Sep 7, 2020 at 23:21
  • yeah, I appreciate that, a one time arq purchase that will back up to google drive might be a good option to use up my remaining google drive, with snapshots, if not only to simply spare me the time of manually doing updates, had no idea that service existed.
    – Toddd
    Commented Sep 8, 2020 at 0:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .