What are the differences between sparse and sparse bundle disk images?
From the DropDMG manual:
Sparse bundle disk images appear as a single file but are actually stored as a folder with many files inside. This makes it more efficient to back them up using Time Machine or other backup utilities, as only the changed parts need to be copied. Additionally, sparse bundle disk images work well with the Compact Image… command. Compatible with Mac OS X 10.5 and later.
Sparse disk images are stored as a single file. This can make backups inefficient for large disk images, because the entire file must be copied each time. The Compact Image… command generally does not reclaim as much disk space as with sparse bundle disk images. Compatible with Mac OS X 10.3 and later.
Thanks! This is really helpful. I'll use an encrypted sparsebundle to back up to Dropbox. I'm happy that this can be done so efficiently.– gentmattMar 3, 2012 at 12:25
Sparse bundle disk image is an optimized form of the sparse disk image. It optimizes intentionally to reduce network load upon backup of changes to the filesystem at the expense of time and space. Specifically it uses a hashing function to store bits of data across a large directory structure which allows changes to be isolated in smaller band files. When copying the disk image elsewhere, rsync like tools will only need to copy the bands that change which makes incremental copies or backups far faster than moving the entire sparse image.
Local storage of the bundle img is less efficient in terms of space used, CPU time needed to process IO to the disk image is increased and when files are deleted, the reclamation of space is delayed and not as complete when compared to a sparse disk image.
Unless you are backing up the bands incrementally online (as Time Machine does to Time Capsule) it's usually better to go with the sparse disk image over a sparse bundle. Some software will look inside a sparse image and only copy the changed blocks, but the bundle allows simpler tools to be more efficient moving changes around.
1I don't agree with your answer (it might be out of date) because I think sparsebundles are just as efficient as sparse images, and possibly more so. Do you have a reference that they use more space? I don't see why they would. In fact, a test I just did shows them to be the same size and faster than both sparseimages and normal DMGs– JoshMar 14, 2016 at 5:37