0

I'm going to buy a NAS to back-up different pcs (~15) with Apple time-machine but I'm facing different doubth regarding compatibilities, and possible issues. I will include informations regarding chosed devices and approaches, but I hadn't bought anything yet so choices can be changed.

The general approach (single NAS, local storage backupped with TM) is not a question topic, or until it will be clar that what I'm asking is not possible.

I will quote different pages where I get informations from, because apple documentation is not exhaustive.

Selected NAS: QNAP TS-431P2-4G
MaxOS versions: 10.6.8 , 10.13 and newer

  1. NAS support time-machine, support Protocols AFP (v3.3) and SMB and has QTS 4.3
  2. MacOS > 10.12 support SMB in addition to AFP for time-machine, QTS 4.3 can run SMB for time machine. No mention has been done regarding the possibility to use both SMB and AFP protocols in the same NAS

    Other link with the same information

    Chatting with QNAP technical service I had a reply:

    Service: Non possono essere combinati i vecchi macos con quelli successivi 10.12 sullo steso nas.
    Old macOS cannot be combined in the same NAS with macOS newer than 10.12

    Me: QTS 4.3.6 o precedenti non supportano contemporaneamente SMB3 e AFP? Non posso configurare un utente per SMB3 (macOs > 10.12) e un altro utente per AFP?Neanche creando diverse partizioni?
    Doesn't QTS 4.3.6 or earlier support SMB3 and AFP concurrently? Can't I set up an user for SMB3 (macOS > 10.12) and another user for AFP? What about using different prtitions?

    Service: non abbiamo casistiche come questo . Se desidera procedere lo stesso posso sollevare il problema con i developers ma deve essere pronto a mesi di troubleshooting nel caso ci fossero problemi con i backup.
    We don't have experience about that. If you decide to proceed anyway I can update developers regarding the problem, but be ready for months of troubleshooting if there will be problems with backups.

  3. AFP can’t share files on Apple File System (APFS). Apple File System (APFS) is the default file system in macOS High Sierra (10.13) for Mac computers with all-flash storage. You can't opt out of the transition to APFS when you upgrade a Mac with all-flash storage to macOS High Sierra. If you need to share files, switch to SMB. If you have network home directories shared via AFP on an APFS volume, update the mount records and user records to use SMB.

    Other link with the same information

    That with point 2 should means that only macOS 10.12 works with both SMB and AFP

Does anyone had experience or informations regarding a successfull way to use the same NAS to store time machine data with two mentioned OS?

The only option, from infos above, is to have a NAS that can handle SMB and AFP concurrently and that was reported as impossible from QNAP technical service (buy maybe other brands can, or he was wrong).

Thanks for help

  • Seems to be the only answer - y It is the cost of using 10 year old OSes. It might be cheaper to replace the 10.6.8 machines – user151019 Sep 10 at 12:04
  • @Mark I can't replace machines because I have software working only with that OS; in fact every worker must have two iMac to be able to use all needed software to complete his job. – brazoayeye Sep 10 at 12:07
  • Can you please be more specific about the actual problems you are facing with your setup? That way you might get answers aimed at solving them, and not just a general discussion about features and limits. – nohillside Sep 10 at 12:38
  • Having said that: can‘t you just create a NAS account for each Mac/macOS combination you want to backup, and avoid any combined access conflicts that way? – nohillside Sep 10 at 12:40
  • @nohillside reading the 1st comment you should agree that the task is not easy, and it's for that reason I let the question open: with different brand maybe the task is doable and with chosen one it's not. Please note first words: "I'm going to buy" , I can't face problems W/O hardwares and how can I specify more the question? – brazoayeye Sep 10 at 19:35
0

After a couple of useless QNAP replies, I moved to a Synology model. Tech service is much faster and ensured it works

I started from a DS418 but I choose a DS918+, I already installed it and it's running without problems with concurrent connections with different protocols

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .