What are your recommendation for opening large text files on OS X? I found both BBEdit and Textmate to be struggling in this department.

  • 1
    there's a dup of this on stackoverflow: stackoverflow.com/questions/952886/… – Robert S Ciaccio Oct 25 '10 at 18:58
  • (That SO question should probably be moved to Super User or here :) – Jonik Oct 26 '10 at 17:15
  • How big is the file you are trying to load? Textmate is terrible with large files, especially files with long lines. I've never had any problem with BBedit opening 10s of Mbyte files. – Henry Oct 26 '10 at 22:20
  • 1
    The 64bit version of Emacs should also be pretty good when opening such big files. – Gio Jan 16 '12 at 10:46
  • 4
    Define "large". Usually it becomes interesting when the files does not fit in available memory. – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen Apr 24 '13 at 11:35

10 Answers 10


I'm using HexFiend to work with a 60 GB text file and it works great (apparently it can handle files as large as 118 GB).

  • Hex Fiend is way faster than VIM on the command line and blows less or more away. Especially for multi-gigabyte single-line text files. Recommended. – Brent Faust Aug 30 '15 at 5:14
  • 1
    +1 I just tried hex fiend on the strength of this rec and it snarfed up a 3+gb inbox archive like instantly, and then successfully searched through the whole thing for a word in under 20 seconds. – Paul Gowder Jan 22 '16 at 15:47
  • 2
    this could be the notepad++ or even better but needs some tweeks. It just prints whatever there in the file no matter of new line or not. I will see if I can make some changes on my freetime to make it taking consideration of new lines. – Olgun Kaya Jun 19 '17 at 4:53
  • 3
    Yeah but it ignore line breaks :( – Gerry Jun 20 '18 at 1:44
  • 1
    Neat, small and super fast. But I agree with the last comment: it doesn't really work as replacement for a text editor, when you want to look at well, line based text files. Too bad, a single checkbox that says "show by lines" or something would make it a perfect tool. – GhostCat salutes Monica C. Nov 6 '18 at 13:04

I found MacVim pretty good at opening large files.

There's even a plugin to speed it up, if the file is really large.

(If you don't want to compile it yourself, you can download a DMG to install it pre-built.)

  • 1
    The command-line version vim is already available in Terminal.app. – mouviciel Oct 24 '10 at 19:46
  • True, but since he talked about BBEdit and Textmate, I assumed he wanted graphical application and not in command-line. – Loïc Wolff Oct 24 '10 at 19:54
  • vim helped me edit a 512MB+ text file. I wish there was something like EM Editor (emeditor.com) for Mac. – fnurl Mar 21 '11 at 19:40
  • Kill Vim with fire. – Magicode Dec 3 '15 at 11:06
  • I easily did a find and replace on a 1.06GB file with MacVim and LargeFile. brilliant! – Andyg8 Jul 12 '17 at 22:37

BBEdit is pretty much the standard for opening large text files on a Mac. I've opened some good-sized files with it, and BBEdit didn't even break a sweat.

How large of a file are you talking about? And how much RAM does your Mac have (both installed and free)?

Edited to add…

Bare Bones released BBEdit 9.6 today, and according to the Release Notes1 (under Changes):

It is now possible to open files significantly larger than before; the ceiling isn't unlimited, but it is no longer limited by the previously extant constraints in the OS.

Sounds to me like it's worth upgrading (free for anyone with BBEdit 9.x) and trying again.

1 If you've never read a Bare Bones release notice before, you should. Even if you have no interest in BBEdit. Even if you have no interest in Bare Bones. Even if you have no interest in text editors in general. They're that good. Yes, really. Iä! Iä! Pnoies fhtagn!

  • +1 for recommending BBEdit and "Iä! Iä! Pnoies fhtagn!". My favorite so far is "The ponies' saronite shoes have been reinforced with titanium, and have a buff applied which increases both ground and flight speed by 30%." – Philip Regan Oct 26 '10 at 22:48
  • I reviewed a previous version of BBEdit for Macworld, and was sorely disappointed that I wasn't allowed to put "No actual ponies" under the Cons section. – Dori Oct 26 '10 at 22:50

Check Sublime Text 2 out. It is one of the best out there.

  • 1
    And Sublime Text 3 more faster then previous version. – Vetal4eg Apr 24 '13 at 9:11
  • 7
    I've been working with a 1.37 GB log file generated by parsing a 13 GB binary file, and both versions of Sublime Text have been unimpressive. They took a minute or more to open the file, and trying to type in search strings resulted in temporary spinning-pizzas-of-death while the program was doing unrequested searches on my partially-typed text. 010 Editor, although it has a clunky interface, is quite fast and stable in comparison. – Bob Murphy Jun 18 '14 at 21:58
  • Sublime Text is nice for medium size files but if you try to open a 50GB file (having 12GB RAM) it crashes. – skan Oct 14 '16 at 19:28

TextWrangler is a great tool for opening editing and saving large files. I wouldn't recommend if for copying and pasting large amounts of content though. Use it if you don't want to have to deal with the vi interface/commands. Like Loic mentioned, MacVim is a great app if you're more familar with vi.

  • 1
    Given that TextWrangler is BBEdit's little brother, I'd guess that someone who is already using BBEdit won't find anything new there. – Dori Oct 26 '10 at 21:38

If you are reading the file only, use the 'less' command. You can navigate and search through the file like vi, but much faster and without the nasty 'line too long' type problems. For working with big production logs, this is an invaluable tool.

  • There is also view for a read-only vi session. – lhf Dec 13 '12 at 11:47
  • @lhf less works on a window of the file, vi reads in the whole file in memory. – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen Apr 24 '13 at 11:37
  • He doesn't want to read only, he wants to edit. He says so right in the title of his question. – mysomic Nov 12 '19 at 16:47

If you are dealing with files over 2 GBs I recommend 010 Editor. It won't load the entire file in memory which means you can use it to open files larger than your available RAM and opening times will be much shorter (took about 20 seconds to open a 7GB file).


http://code.google.com/p/macvim/ worked with a 1 gig file searching file took about 1 min


For me, where BBEdit choked on 750MB, UltraEdit (not free) worked satisfactorily fast.


My first choice is SlickEdit. It looks a bit old fashioned, but I have seen no other editor that deals with large files (even GBs of text) that fast, and still giving a ton of features.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .