6

Why would Finder image icons (in column view, list view and icon view in a Finder window) not display an image's content, when no custom icon has been applied. The files are image files (PNG, JPG, TIFF, PSD, etc.) and only the smallest size is affected.

In column view at text size 12 only the generic jpg, or png icon shows, but not the image content itself. If I change the text size (in view options) to 13, the icons slightly increase in size and laod and display correctly.

In icon view the same happens with the icons set to 16x16. As soon as I drag the slider to 20x20, or above all icons show correctly. List view also displays the generic icons, unless the larger icon size is chosen.

I've tried removing the Finder preferences:

~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.finder.plist

I've also tried resetting the icon services cache here:

/Library/Caches/com.apple.iconservices.store

...and removing those found here:

sudo find /private/var/folders/ -name com.apple.iconservices

Permissions (ls -alOe@) on the /private/var/folders/... (found above) also look the same as on clean, bare-bone installations, where the icons are shown correctly, even when only 16x16 pixels.

In column view as example, if left on text size 13 through a reboot, most icons also show after reducing the size of the text to 12, but turning off "Show icon preview" in the view options and on again, leaves the text size 12 icons generic again, while increasing the size to 13 straight away loads the previews.

Why would 20x20 pixel icons load without issues after every restart and 16x16 just sit there? Are they different caches and/or mechanisms?

Running macOS Sierra 10.12.4 on a Retina MacBook Pro11,3 (mid 2014), 2.5GHz, 16 GB RAM, 500.28 GB Apple SSD, Intel Iris Pro 1536 MB VRAM / NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 2048 MB VRAM. - Resolution: 2880x1800 set to "Default for Display". No external monitor (or other devices for that matter) is attached.

The issue persists over various updates and even running the Installer Assistant (aka Full Installer) over the installation. It also exhibits the same behaviour in safe mode, but a second (new) user has no such issues. The Desktop (outside a Finder window) also has no issues displaying 16x16 icons.

My main interest here is not so much the troubleshooting (since the installation in question is quite dirty and it will be down to me to find the problem), but to understand the mechanism that causes the difference in behaviour between loading the smallest icon size and all other sizes above.

Improve this question
5
  • 1
    Please let us know your macOS/OS X version an the hardware you are running it on. Do you have a retina Display and/or do you use an external LCD? If so, at which resolution?
    – oa-
    Commented Apr 24, 2017 at 7:06
  • Have you tried deleting ~/Desktop/.DS_Store?
    – Harv
    Commented Apr 25, 2017 at 22:15
  • @Harv Yes, I'd tried that too, but forgot to mention it. Also the same 16 pixel icons load fine, if I boot into a second (empty) volume on the same Mac and access them that way, or from a second user account. Edit: the Desktop icons load fine, as long as I don't view them in a Finder window.
    – Redarm
    Commented Apr 26, 2017 at 17:22
  • Did the other user account work only in safe mode, or always?
    – Harv
    Commented Apr 26, 2017 at 19:37
  • I can fast user switch to the other (empty) admin user account and it always loads the 16 pixel icons in the Finder windows. No issues there at all.
    – Redarm
    Commented Apr 26, 2017 at 21:41

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3
+100

You can modify the minimum thumbnail size in the info.plist (in .../DropboxQL.qlgenerator/Contents/):

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    ...
    <key>QLSupportsConcurrentRequests</key>
    <false/>
    <key>QLThumbnailMinimumSize</key>
    <real>17</real>
</dict>
</plist>

After editing in a smaller size in the plist and a reboot, you will get a preview for 16x16 pixel icons in the Finder again.

The DropboxQL.qlgenerator usually is located in /Applications/Dropbox.app/Contents/Resources/

Also check for older DropboxQL.qlgenerator in other places and either remove them or also modify the Info.plist.

The priority order from first to least seems to be:

  • app embedded qlgenerators
  • ~/Library/QuickLook/
  • /Library/QuickLook/
  • /System/Library/QuickLook/
Improve this answer
2
  • Thanks for the late answer. Just to add: the DropboxQL.qlgenerator within Dropbox.app itself doesn't seem to cause the issue, probably due to the fact that Dropbox was not actively running. Some - most likely - older DropboxQL.qlgenerator was found in the user library ~/Library/QuickLook/ and caused the issue.
    – Redarm
    Commented Apr 30, 2017 at 13:07
  • @Redarm I will add this to my answer - thanx
    – klanomath
    Commented Apr 30, 2017 at 15:07
2

While this answer doesn't explain the why, it at least explains the who. The culprit was:

~/Library/QuickLook/DropboxQL.qlgenerator

After removing it, the 16 pixel Finder icons started loading again.

Even though "Finder Integration" was disabled and the application wasn't running it interfered.

While this solves the problem, there is still a bounty to be had for an explanation as to why only the smallest icon size is affected and no others above.

Update: thanks to klanomath, looking at the Info.plist within the DropboxQL.qlgenerator showed a minimum of 17 pixels (in contrast, the system's qlgenerator shows 0):

Quick Look thumbnail minimum size 16

After editing the plist and changing the value to 16, the 16 pixel icons kept on loading.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Have you tried to force QL to use another plugin (the standard /System/Library/QuickLook/Image.qlgenerator) for public.image? E.g.: Prefer my QuickLook plugin > editing DropboxQL.qlgenerator or moving it to a less preferred location...
    – klanomath
    Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 14:03
  • Ah, yes thanks. Editing the info.plist of the qlgenerator works. The qlgenerator was set to "Quick Look thumbnail minimum size 17", instead of "Quick Look thumbnail minimum size 16", which seems to work so far, after logging out and back in again. If you would like to formulate an answer for the 100 points?
    – Redarm
    Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 14:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .