3

I have a software company and my developers each have their own preferences for an OS (Mac, Linux based or Windows).

For windows I know you can use remote desktop and stuff. I know it is possible in Mac as well. But is it viable to let the employees that prefer Mac work from 1 thin server on a powerfull Mac Pro? If yes: How many should I expect to be able to work simultaneously? Does TightVNC as client give good results or is it tedious (slow / bad graphics)?

I like to dream that everyone can use all the computers available on every workplace, because they work remote and don't have to use a specific computer each time to access their programs and files.

Yes I can create network shares, but sometime someone who doesn't prefere to work on Mac still has to develop on one because of XCode for example and we could buy Macs for these situations it's not ideal just for that instance.

  • Take a look at this question, which should answer what you're asking here. – Mike Scott Feb 19 '16 at 8:18
  • This should be marked as a duplicate of apple.stackexchange.com/questions/54001/… but we can't as there is a bounty – mmmmmm Feb 19 '16 at 9:37
  • @Mark read the title... I ask not HOW but if this workaround doesn't violate the law and if the performance is workable for everyday use – Thomas Feb 19 '16 at 9:44
  • 3
    Yes it is legal and how good is opinion based – mmmmmm Feb 19 '16 at 9:48
3
+100

Can you use VNC (or ARD or some other remote desktop software) to remote into a server to do development work?

Short answer is "yes."

However, it is a royal PITA. I use VNC to administer my OS X machines on my gigabit LAN and I can tell you that the lag is infuriating. Trying to do development work, I can only imagine it being a nightmare.

What worked for my developers was that we had several MBPs that would float around the department depending on the project. For "quick" tasks VNC worked, but when they needed to be heads down on a project, they would check out a MBP and use it for the duration of their task.

The main thing to keep in mind is that people like what they like - Mac/Linux/Win. The "hotelling" concept is a nice goal, but not feasible for devs who spend their lives in front of a monitor. Ensuring work is accessible anywhere is the reason we have a cloud and GitHub. These are areas you should investigate thoroughly before you spend time trying to re-architect your infrastructure.

| improve this answer | |
2

I am not a lawyer, and this should not be construed as professional legal advice.

Is it legal? As long as you have a legitimate license to use OS X and you create separate accounts for each user who needs to access the system, then I believe the answer is yes.

Is it workable? Based upon my own experience with remote desktop protocols and the anecdotal evidence of the other commenters here, no. Because of network load, network latency, and CPU load the experience will not be optimal for your users. It will, in all probability, reduce the ability of your developers to do their work, and harm your company's profits.

| improve this answer | |
1

If you want a scalable cross-platform solution for remote desktop, packages based on VNC are your only choice.

More consumer-oriented packages like Teamviewer or Chrome Remote Desktop are also available on multiple platforms, are easier to setup and have better security out of the box, but are most probably not a good choice in the longer run.

It doesn't have to end there though. If the cross-platform/remote-compiling is the main thing you're after, perhaps you could have a look at Jenkins. You can opt for a setup either at your company premises or - as many prefer - on a colocated machine in a datacenter.

Some of the top guns at the Apple store (on iOS and OSX) are using this to automate and manage their projects across multiple developers in-house and abroad.

You can have multiple build machines on multiple platforms, it's quite expandable. And it's FOSS.

Even though technically it would work, having your developer, working on a windows machine, VNC'ing to an OSX machine to write his code on, is pure torture. Even if the VNC server machine is placed right next to his', there will always be -a very small- delay. This might not be noticeable when doing small hacks, but when typing loads and loads of text for longer periods, it does. It will never be the same than writing on his native machine.

| improve this answer | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .