Both seem to do roughly the same thing. What, if anything, are the relevant differences?

2 Answers 2


Don't know if there are really major differences that set one far apart from the other.

One of the bigger differentiators is that Soundhound claims to recoginze songs that are hummed and/or sung by the user.

From a purely opinion oriented view, I've had better success with Soundhound at identifying songs than Shazam - but both do the job pretty well. Soundhound also seems to be quicker at returning results for me than Shazam. Again, that's just my own experience and I've, by no means, done exhaustive testing between the two.

Shazam seems to have better search but Soundhound can search by lyrics.

  • 1
    And soundhound has been around for quite longer I believe. It used to be called midomi.
    – cregox
    Mar 23, 2011 at 16:24
  • 1
    FWIW - I have used Shazam and Soundhound and found that SoundHound finds songs that Shazam doesn't but I've never had Shazam find a song Soundhound couldn't.
    – TJ Luoma
    Dec 9, 2011 at 20:13
  • +1 for SoundHound finding more songs than Shazam. I've had SH find songs despite obscene amounts of ambient noise (crowds cheering, people talking loudly, etc.). I bought both years ago and bounced between the two, favoring one over the other, but over time, just found SH to be far more reliable.
    – user10355
    Dec 9, 2011 at 21:39

Here's a great video about SoundHound vs. Shazam that should help answer your question:

  • 1
    Can you summarize for those who don't have time to watch a video?
    – nohillside
    Dec 10, 2011 at 7:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .