Timeline for What techniques for disk, volume and file system management are possible with OS X, but troublesome within Disk Utility?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2015 at 23:45 | comment | added | Graham Perrin | Chat: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/25242037#25242037 | |
| Nov 7, 2015 at 6:24 | comment | added | Gordon Davisson | Since Disk Utility got a major rewrite in El Capitan, which fixed some of the problems of the old one (can now see devices even when they have Core Storage volumes on them), but also created some new ...gaps... would it make sense to create a new question for the new Disk Utility? | |
| Nov 7, 2015 at 5:58 | history | edited | Graham Perrin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
link to a MacRumors Forums post about 2012 AppleSeed enhancement request (ER) 197379505
|
| Aug 14, 2012 at 22:11 | history | edited | Graham Perrin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A little more rationale.
|
| Aug 14, 2012 at 21:28 | comment | added | Graham Perrin | I doubt that I'll get answers to a blog post without Ask Different, but close the question if you think it's not fitting. Maybe I need to reword the question, but I can't get my head around that at the moment … | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 21:24 | comment | added | daviesgeek | @bmike I agree. I think this really isn't best as a question, but rather a blog post, as you suggested. | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 20:52 | comment | added | bmike♦ | This feels more like the beginning of a blog post than the summary of a problem you face in need of an answer. | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 20:23 | answer | added | username | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 18:40 | history | edited | Graham Perrin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 177 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2012 at 18:33 | comment | added | Graham Perrin | This question is partly a companion to, more focused than, What features from Lion will be lost when upgrading to Mountain Lion?. | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 17:32 | comment | added | nohillside♦ | Vote to close because I don't see the point of it. Just collecting a list of potential non-features of Disk Utility doesn't provide any value. Collecting a list of features a (any) Disk Utility should support would probably be better (at least for someone who wants to build a new one) but is off-topic. | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 0:24 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 26, 2012 at 3:03 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2012 at 8:01 | answer | added | Graham Perrin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 10:29 | comment | added | Graham Perrin | Alongside the close vote: please, can you offer an improvement to the question? I do wish for this question to be acceptable in the way discussed with Nathan Greenstein – an inventory of what Disk Utility doesn't support, if you like. | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 8:51 | answer | added | Graham Perrin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 8:18 | answer | added | Graham Perrin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 8:13 | history | asked | Graham Perrin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |