Skip to main content
More specific about the known issue with 10.8.5.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246

Mountain Lion no longer supports placing aMountain Lion no longer supports diskutil eraseDisk placement of partition mapmaps on a Core Storage logical volumevolumes –

Mountain Lion no longer supports placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume –

Mountain Lion no longer supports diskutil eraseDisk placement of partition maps on Core Storage logical volumes –

Mountain Lion no longer supports placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246

Mountain Lion no longer supports placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume –

gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ diskutil list /dev/disk4 && diskutil list /dev/disk5
/dev/disk4
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *8.0 GB     disk4
   1:                        EFI                         209.7 MB   disk4s1
   2:          Apple_CoreStorage test                    7.7 GB     disk4s2
   3:                 Apple_Boot Boot OS X               134.2 MB   disk4s3
/dev/disk5
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:                  Apple_HFS test                   *7.3 GB     disk5
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ diskutil unmount /dev/disk5
Volume test on disk5 unmounted
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ sudo zpool create -O casesensitivity=insensitive -O normalization=formD Billski /dev/disk5

Unable to begin erase operation: Placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume is not supported (-69671)
diskutil eraseDisk failed, exit status 1
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ sw_vers
ProductName:    Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.8.5
BuildVersion:   12F37
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ 

– thanks to mgrosman for the alert.

Mountain Lion no longer supports placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume –

gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ diskutil list /dev/disk4 && diskutil list /dev/disk5
/dev/disk4
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *8.0 GB     disk4
   1:                        EFI                         209.7 MB   disk4s1
   2:          Apple_CoreStorage test                    7.7 GB     disk4s2
   3:                 Apple_Boot Boot OS X               134.2 MB   disk4s3
/dev/disk5
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:                  Apple_HFS test                   *7.3 GB     disk5
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ diskutil unmount /dev/disk5
Volume test on disk5 unmounted
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ sudo zpool create -O casesensitivity=insensitive -O normalization=formD Billski /dev/disk5

Unable to begin erase operation: Placing a partition map on a Core Storage logical volume is not supported (-69671)
diskutil eraseDisk failed, exit status 1
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ sw_vers
ProductName:    Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.8.5
BuildVersion:   12F37
gpes3e-gjp4:~ gjp22$ 

– thanks to mgrosman for the alert.

For most use cases the file system mixture is not recommended.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246

HintHints

Since HFS+ has a single global lock for all metadata updates (held across the I/O) it is highly sensitive to disk latencies. So whilst the mixture of ZFS with JHFS+ on a single disk is possible, for most use cases the file system mixture is not recommended.

This example also makes some use of compression, and of child file systems. If you experiment with features such as these with an unreleased version of ZEVO or the operating system, proceed with caution.

Hint

This example also makes some use of compression, and of child file systems. If you experiment with features such as these with an unreleased version of ZEVO or the operating system, proceed with caution.

Hints

Since HFS+ has a single global lock for all metadata updates (held across the I/O) it is highly sensitive to disk latencies. So whilst the mixture of ZFS with JHFS+ on a single disk is possible, for most use cases the file system mixture is not recommended.

This example also makes some use of compression, and of child file systems.

Repairs … Proceed with caution.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246
Loading
Making clear that this answer is for OS X 10.7.4. Correction to the number of a slice. Screenshots of the end result.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246
Loading
Known issues.
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246
Loading
Source Link
Graham Perrin
  • 7.8k
  • 14
  • 83
  • 246
Loading