Timeline for Did the Java 1.6.0_31 update fix the Flashback trojan problem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 9, 2012 at 16:29 | comment | added | da4 | Actually, they don't. The Java vulnerability that Flashback exploited was patched by Oracle in February; Apple only released their own updated version a week ago. Plenty of other components of OS X are not current with their original OSS versions (rsync --version if you want a good example). | |
Apr 8, 2012 at 2:48 | comment | added | Alexander | however apple does an impressive job of keeping up with this sorta stuff | |
Apr 8, 2012 at 1:48 | comment | added | Chris W. Rea | @XAleXOwnZX Yet, now there's this very real Mac virus for the antivirus vendors to add to the signatures. The misconception is, therefore, obsolete? The Mac has become a victim of its own success, and is now a worthwhile target. | |
Apr 7, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Alexander | anti virus for mac usually contains few to none mac virus signatures to check for, it's meant mainly to prevent your mac from spreading around windows viruses to friends/family etc | |
Apr 7, 2012 at 13:04 | comment | added | Chris W. Rea | @XAleXOwnZX What is "off topic software"? And .. what's the misconception about anti-virus? | |
Apr 6, 2012 at 20:45 | comment | added | Alexander | please don't recommend off topic software, and anti virus for macs is a big misconception that shouldn't go without explanation | |
Apr 6, 2012 at 20:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Apr 6, 2012 at 21:05 | |||||
Apr 6, 2012 at 19:16 | history | answered | da4 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |