Timeline for otool shows only single architecture for system fat binaries in macOS
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29 at 21:14 | comment | added | Gilby |
Sorry, I don't know the details of how fat binaries are built. I can only answer your question about the use of otool.
|
|
| Mar 29 at 9:32 | comment | added | mrn | otool -arch all works, but interestingly otool -h does show all architectures for fat binaries being part of 3rd party applications (and arm64, not arm64e as system binaries). I've edited the question. | |
| Mar 29 at 9:27 | vote | accept | mrn | ||
| Mar 29 at 9:30 | |||||
| Mar 27 at 3:40 | history | answered | Gilby | CC BY-SA 4.0 |