Timeline for Is antivirus software a necessity with the "rise" of MacDefender and others?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://apple.stackexchange.com/ with https://apple.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 2, 2012 at 23:46 | history | edited | user3117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 273 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:58 | history | edited | user3117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 350 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:56 | vote | accept | JavaAndCSharp | ||
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:56 | comment | added | JavaAndCSharp | Great! I was hoping for something like that. | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:55 | comment | added | user3117 | Here's one: reedcorner.net/guides/macvirus the true "virus" just isn't out there. The sites I see saying there is a serious risk are usually selling antivirus software. Or they are ZeoBIT. | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:50 | comment | added | JavaAndCSharp | Something like an article on TUAW/other would be fine. I just want it to have some credibility so I can prove the Windows people wrong :) | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:48 | history | edited | user3117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:48 | comment | added | user3117 | Not sure what you want? I think this is one of those cases where the proof of a risk is what needs to be shown, not the proof of no risk. I can't prove Apple won't introduce a new expandable Mac mini next week, but you wouldn't believe it was going to happen on that basis. | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:44 | comment | added | JavaAndCSharp | Could you please add some sources? Other than that, I guess some on the Windows side just needed to poke some fun at Apple, especially after the 'Get a Mac' ads that they're just recovering from. | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 0:42 | history | answered | user3117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |