Timeline for Are there any physical differences between the Verizon and AT&T iPad (3rd generation)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 25, 2012 at 17:43 | vote | accept | bmike♦ | ||
| Mar 20, 2012 at 21:59 | comment | added | Moshe | Good catch. Fixed. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 21:59 | history | edited | Moshe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:32 | comment | added | gentmatt | @Moshe You contradict yourself. Both models support the same GSM frequencies in your answer. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:23 | comment | added | Moshe | I'll keep looking for now. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:21 | comment | added | bmike♦ | I think that's the best we can do now - i will likely bounty this later - I'd feel better getting an Ars or reputable tear apart documenting the differences rather than take a rumor site's unsourced speculation. It will be interesting to see why VZW can do 2100 MHz on DC-HSDPA/HSPA+ but not 2100 MHZ LTE if it's in fact a hardware limitation. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:16 | history | edited | Moshe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 473 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:13 | comment | added | Moshe | I'm unsure, but I would infer from the Macrumors article that the hardware is the difference. Edit: See my edit, it's hardware based. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:11 | comment | added | bmike♦ | Excellent! That is how I should have asked the question. Is the difference in LTE 700+2100 vs 700 a result of an easily changed carrier profile setting when you pop in another SIM or are there hardware antenna and chipset differences that prevent the VZW unit from ever talking LET at 2100 MHz? I wonder if this is because they list what the carrier will deliver and not of what the device is physically capable. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:06 | history | answered | Moshe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |