Skip to main content
deleted 10 characters in body
Source Link
bmike
  • 241.3k
  • 80
  • 433
  • 958

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use that tool as designed and documented. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a test machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s likely “non-optimal” or “extra work” to force your modifications into /usr and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Debates about package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be passionate (and sometimes prickly). Where to store Unix or command line files can be as opinionated in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs|nano|pico] as compared to newer programming editors with more graphical features. Choosing for what you intend to optimize and how you prefer to learn and work is a highly personal choice and not something that is strictly right or wrong.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

With the introduction of ARM and Intel tooling to Homebrew, the defaults are now /opt/homebrew and usr/local for brewing.

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use that tool as designed and documented. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s likely “non-optimal” or “extra work” to force your modifications into /usr and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Debates about package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be passionate (and sometimes prickly). Where to store Unix or command line files can be as opinionated in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs|nano|pico] as compared to newer programming editors with more graphical features. Choosing for what you intend to optimize and how you prefer to learn and work is a highly personal choice and not something that is strictly right or wrong.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

With the introduction of ARM and Intel tooling to Homebrew, the defaults are now /opt/homebrew and usr/local for brewing.

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use that tool as designed and documented. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a test machine and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s likely “non-optimal” or “extra work” to force your modifications into /usr and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Debates about package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be passionate (and sometimes prickly). Where to store Unix or command line files can be as opinionated in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs|nano|pico] as compared to newer programming editors with more graphical features. Choosing for what you intend to optimize and how you prefer to learn and work is a highly personal choice and not something that is strictly right or wrong.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

With the introduction of ARM and Intel tooling to Homebrew, the defaults are now /opt/homebrew and usr/local for brewing.

added 346 characters in body
Source Link
bmike
  • 241.3k
  • 80
  • 433
  • 958

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use the toolsthat tool as designed and documented. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s “bad”likely “non-optimal” or “extra work” to force your modifications into /usr and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

PackageDebates about package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be as passionate (and sometimes prickly) in. Where to store Unix or command line files can be as opinionated in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs][ed|sed|vi|emacs|nano|pico] as well as compared to newer programming editors with more graphical basisfeatures. Choosing for what you intend to optimize and how you prefer to learn and work is a highly personal choice and not something that is strictly right or wrong.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

With the introduction of ARM and Intel tooling to Homebrew, the defaults are now /opt/homebrew and usr/local for brewing.

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use the tools. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s “bad” and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be as passionate (and sometimes prickly) in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs] as well as newer programming editors with more graphical basis.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use that tool as designed and documented. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s likely “non-optimal” or “extra work” to force your modifications into /usr and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Debates about package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be passionate (and sometimes prickly). Where to store Unix or command line files can be as opinionated in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs|nano|pico] as compared to newer programming editors with more graphical features. Choosing for what you intend to optimize and how you prefer to learn and work is a highly personal choice and not something that is strictly right or wrong.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

With the introduction of ARM and Intel tooling to Homebrew, the defaults are now /opt/homebrew and usr/local for brewing.

added 317 characters in body
Source Link
bmike
  • 241.3k
  • 80
  • 433
  • 958

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use the tools. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s “bad” and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be as passionate (and sometimes prickly) in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs] as well as newer programming editors with more graphical basis.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

This is a bad idea. Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be as passionate (and sometimes prickly) in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs] as well as newer programming editors with more graphical basis.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

This is a bad idea if your goal is to be productive and use the tools. But you can learn a ton by disabling SIP on a machine you don’t need and seeing what breaks when you modify the tool. If your goal is to learn, go for it. Here is why it’s “bad” and some very good resources on the history of where to add customizations on unix.

Apple protects /usr via system integrity protection and the closest place to / that’s encouraged to write files is /usr/local

Package managers (and the people that write and spend a lot of time using them) can be as passionate (and sometimes prickly) in terms of preference as those debating text editors like [ed|sed|vi|emacs] as well as newer programming editors with more graphical basis.

This answer particularly has some good thinking and clear discussion as well as the above questions. There would have to be a very compelling basis to diverge from the standard for homebrew even if you didn’t but heads with Apple on SIP in the process (which is what happens in /usr).

Source Link
bmike
  • 241.3k
  • 80
  • 433
  • 958
Loading