Timeline for How do I debug an out-of-control "kernel_task" process?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 27, 2021 at 21:20 | answer | added | user415857 | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 23, 2019 at 15:50 | answer | added | Luca Rocchi | timeline score: 0 | |
Apr 30, 2018 at 20:35 | answer | added | kenorb | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 26, 2016 at 18:50 | answer | added | rogerdpack | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 25, 2016 at 3:20 | answer | added | kenorb | timeline score: 7 | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 16:32 | answer | added | intcreator | timeline score: 14 | |
May 3, 2015 at 3:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/askdifferent/status/594711719471099904 | ||
Jan 28, 2015 at 4:44 | answer | added | Somebody still uses you MS-DOS | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57 | answer | added | Lri | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 25, 2012 at 21:11 | answer | added | studgeek | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 21, 2012 at 3:27 | comment | added | twe4ked | Constant 200% CPU sounds pretty out of control for any process. | |
Mar 31, 2012 at 8:07 | comment | added | Graham Perrin |
I would not describe kernel_task as out of control. Activity Monitor may be not the best utility for diagnoses in this area. In Console, add system log queries to help you identify the ways in which kernel task is used; then refine the opening question to one that may be more easily answered.
|
|
Feb 29, 2012 at 18:02 | answer | added | Christopher | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 25, 2011 at 3:28 | history | edited | daviesgeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Nov 25, 2011 at 3:17 | answer | added | Jameson Quinn | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 24, 2011 at 11:12 | answer | added | mspasov | timeline score: 11 | |
Mar 24, 2011 at 2:57 | history | asked | Ricket | CC BY-SA 2.5 |