Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Ever since Steve Jobs published his Thoughts on Flash, I've always seen Apple as advocators of open web standards. Scrolling halfway down the What is Safari page seems to confirm this notion.

So, why does Apple overwhelmingly use images for their headers? For example,

whatis_title.png

and on Retina displays,

whatis_title_2x.png

Wouldn't it make sense, with respect to both open web standards and page load time, to instead link to the fonts in a CSS file?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by bassplayer7, Gerry, Nathan Greenstein Apr 8 '13 at 15:21

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
There are many ways to do web development. It will be difficult, if not impossible to definitively say why Apple uses images instead of regular CSS-styled text. Chances are it comes back to backwards compatibility, or more granular control over display. Again, this is just a guess. –  bassplayer7 Apr 8 '13 at 15:14
    
We're not Apple; we don't know why they do or don't do certain things. The best answer we can give you, I'm afraid, is "Because they choose not to." Anything else is speculation. –  Nathan Greenstein Apr 8 '13 at 15:22

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Apple has been notably touchy about 3rd-Party use of their fonts in the past and I'm inclined to say they still are. Apple use to include a few fonts in OS 8, for example, which had Apple-copyrighted design. You had access to them in that anything that specifically used that font rendered correctly, but if you wanted to be able to select the font in a text document, you had to jump through some hoops and enable it manually.

The font in question is almost definitely Myriad Pro or an Apple derivative. You "must" purchase a license to use it commercially.

While I generally agree with your assessment of using CSS3 fonts, it seems that Apple may be more concerned with copyright. Load time differences are probably negligible for most people accessing the Apple site. I'm sure they have people in Marketing looking at that data.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.