Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

You would think it would make some kind of difference...

share|improve this question
It will be interesting if anyone has actually done a measurement to show that this controller is faster or slower than SO-DIMM. I would expect the opposite - no measurable difference with only the CPU/memory controller/cache and RAM speed itself making any difference. – bmike Dec 3 '12 at 17:23

Not really. Access times might be faster by a handful of picoseconds, since the electrical impulses would travel a slightly shorter distance by taking away the circuitry in the socket. However that distance is dwarfed by the variance in placement of the RAM on the logic board — sometimes it's closer to the CPU, sometimes farther away.

The predominant factors for speed of RAM are the clock speed and bit width, not the physical layout.

share|improve this answer

Faster, probably not. Otherwise the difference is twofold, IMO.

  • With no physical RAM slots, they can more closely integrate the components to save on space and make a thinner machine.
  • From a commercial perspective, you have to pay up-front for more RAM, as you cannot add more later on (you have to buy a new computer).
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.