umm... like vim, emacs? – rm -rfJun 11 '12 at 22:38
2
@Jay Did you even try running nano in the Terminal? – CajunLukeJun 11 '12 at 22:43
@CajunLuke No, for some reason I thought it wasn't there. Oh well. – JayJun 11 '12 at 22:50
1
I disagree with the heavy down vote penalty you've incurred. This is an easy question to answer if you have a Mac in front of you. But if you don't have a Mac at hand or don't own one yet and are wondering what the command line experience is like this is potentially useful information. Just because something seems obvious or is well known to you doesn't mean that's the case for everyone else. – Ian C.♦Jun 12 '12 at 13:41
They've been on every Mac I've ever used since the 10.2 days, and I'd be shocked if OS X had ever not included them. – CajunLukeJun 11 '12 at 22:42
1
And for hard core users there is even /bin/ed :-) – patrix♦Jun 12 '12 at 5:58
@CajunLuke: actually, nano was added in 10.4 (although pico, the editor it's based on, was in at least 10.3). I can't say for certain about emacs, but I'm pretty sure vi was there in Rhapsody Server. – Gordon DavissonJun 12 '12 at 6:02
@GordonDavisson Nano was definitely around in 10.2 and 10.3. I remember using it (and I've an old 10.3 Mac I can check on if needed). – CajunLukeJun 12 '12 at 13:39
@CajunLuke: I just checked under 10.3.9 computer (server version, but that shouldn't matter) and it has pico but not nano. I don't have a 10.2 machine handy anymore... – Gordon DavissonJun 12 '12 at 15:40
vim,emacs? – rm -rf Jun 11 '12 at 22:38nanoin the Terminal? – CajunLuke Jun 11 '12 at 22:43