Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On Windows, I use TeraCopy for improved file copying. Are there any similar equivalents for OS X?

In particular, I'd like to see things like copy speed.

share|improve this question
If you can treat the Mac drive as an external drive, like a NAS, and do the copy from a windows machine, file pilot copy would work for you. They have a free “no registration required” eval download at . It is super fast, particularly for update copies, and has an easy to use GUI interface (but can also be run in a batch mode like a script). – user10819 Sep 8 '11 at 18:45
Doesn't osx's own copier do just that? – user27889 Aug 22 '12 at 23:14
@foley do just what? afaik, it just shows you a progress bar. teracopy has considerably more features. – Ian Aug 23 '12 at 5:49
If you would list the specific features past a progress bar and time estimate, people here might have more suggestions. Are you still looking for a solution? – bmike Feb 20 '13 at 14:58
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I looked around for something like TeraCopy a while back but everything I found was pretty horrid. In the end I decided to just use cp and rsync on the command line.

share|improve this answer
aha, that makes sense. – Ian Nov 28 '10 at 22:17

Since you mentioned “better” and in particular “copy speed”, I believe the only answer is Xfile. Other than that, nothing will beat cp ;)

The world’s fastest file manager for OS X

It’s not free, quite the contrary.

share|improve this answer
XFile also crashes a lot, and is not particularly fast at all, at least in my experience. – Fake Name Aug 23 '11 at 5:18

The best suggestions from this thread are:

share|improve this answer
Consider ForkLift: – LordParsley Jun 20 '14 at 16:38

While much more than just a copy utility, Pathfinder shows copy speed. Along with Launchbar, it's one of my must have utilities.

share|improve this answer
This is the most useful answer of all – Nikita Volkov Feb 20 '13 at 14:42

Try Ultracopier, looks a bit like TeraCopy and works on Mac & PC

About copy speed, all is same for the big file. Ultracopier (my software) is better for small file. But warning, I have this this big performance mistake:

  • All copy small file from network from into 3s but 1min42s for Teracopy
  • All copy big file from network from into 1min20s but 2min47s for Copyhandler
share|improve this answer
What is meant with the "All copy" and "from into" and "Copyhandler"? – Henno Jun 5 at 13:19

Have you first compared speeds between TeraCopy and the built in Mac OS X file copy? I hate to sound like a generic condescending Mac user, but what exactly is wrong with the built in one?

share|improve this answer
I would like to compare speeds, but the built in one does not tell me the copy speed. Unless there is a way? – Ian Nov 30 '10 at 9:37
With maths...? Find a folder of weighty size (or a large file, but you'll get different results for one vs many files) and find out its size. Time how long it takes to copy. Divide size by time it took to copy, and you'll get the average speed. – Tim Dec 1 '10 at 0:38
It would be nice if the UI would simply display the copy rate, as opposed to me having to do division. Because I'm lazy. :) – Ian Dec 1 '10 at 7:53
Or you can install iStat ( and see the disk throughput in a nice graph/number… – Martín Marconcini Dec 1 '10 at 11:44
Thanks, that's handy. – Ian Dec 1 '10 at 20:19

An app I developed, Ultracopier, fits your use case.

Here is a YouTube demo showcasing the PC version in action.

share|improve this answer

There is one application that I found online that works similar to tera copy, and that too for mac osx, named turbo copy pro:

This is a multi-function application and you can view the copy speed and also pause and resume the copy process similar to tera copy. The only drawback it has is that it is not free.

I have tried and tested the trial version and it owrkds absolutely fine. Please have a look and post your review.

share|improve this answer

protected by bmike Feb 20 '13 at 14:58

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.