Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've got a couple of DMGs that should fit on a CD (one per CD) but burning softwares (Disk Utility & Toast) say that they are 2 or 3 times bigger and thus need a DVD.
Why is that ?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Is the disk image compressed?

If so, then the .dmg file is probably going to be about 2 or 3 times smaller than the data it contains. When you mount the image, you can do Get Info on the mounted volume to see the volume size, which is how much space you will need on actual media.

Even an uncompressed image file may be smaller than the volume it contains as the image file may not include unallocated space.

share|improve this answer
That's it, I realized it later. – user2113 Feb 24 '12 at 0:51

Different file systems and disk formats have different block sizes, which all files are rounded up to in size. If you have a lot of small files on one file system, and try to move them all to a different file system or media format with much larger block sizes, the total space required can balloon.

share|improve this answer
Huh ? pretty weird, I run Snow Leopard on a Mac OS extended journalized partition, the DMG are HFS+ from what I can see and the CDs are regular 700MB Verbatim. Since I'm burning an image and not pasting a bunch of files I don't see how 500MB could become 1GB... – user2113 Feb 23 '12 at 1:40
I burned them and it was as fast as for their normal size, but the surface burned on the disk was larger, yet after I mouted it the space taken was the normal one. I guess it's the block size thing. – user2113 Feb 23 '12 at 2:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.