Sign up ×
Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for a software to handle archives on OS X. I know there are many of them quite easy to find, but none seems to have the most basic feature that most Windows archive applications have: browsing!

I mean, most OS X unarchivers, when they open an archive, they just unzip it... then ask you for target location in the best case.

What I want is something such as WinRAR or 7zip, which is basically an explorer (ie. Finder) that opens archives.

What I want is precisely this! I want to be able to browse any archive without extracting it, opening files directly from the archive and then be able to modify it so that the file is actually modified in the archive. I want to be able to drag'n'drop a file to and from an archive to extract/add it.

Those features are so useful when modifying directly JAR files contents, JAR files MANIFESTs, war webapps conf-files and so on...

Thank you.

share|improve this question

migrated from Jul 2 '11 at 17:05

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

8 Answers 8

up vote 3 down vote accepted

iUnarchive seems to be quite nice. It is available at the App Store.

iUnarchive can be used to preview and extract files from archives. Instead of cluttering the disk with files, you can preview and open files directly from within iUnarchive.

Only files selected for preview and extracted files are actually uncompressed.

Supported archives include zip, rar, 7-zip, tar, gzip, bz2/BZip2, LhA and StuffIt, including password protection for zip, 7-zip, rar and multi part rar.

Edit: Not sure if you looked for a free application. It costs 4 Euro now (I think it was free before).

share|improve this answer
This one looks quite promising thank you! – tisek Jul 10 '11 at 20:11
It's $10 right now! At half the price of the entire Operating System, Mountain Lion, it's not worth it at all. Thanks for the pointer though! – DeepSpace101 Aug 20 '12 at 23:22
This tool can not show the contents of a large .zip-file – such Apr 9 at 9:43

Zipeg allows you to browse and uncompress a number of formats, but does not allow compressing.

share|improve this answer
This one is also free, unlike most other suggestions here. It allows browsing and previewing without permanent extraction. +1! – Szabolcs Nov 1 '12 at 15:59

Apple actually has an example application called ZipBrowser on their developer site. The direct download is located here. Unfortunately this only works with zip files. The actually app is only 600K so it's nice and small. (Note that ZipBrowser only works on 10.6+)

share|improve this answer

Springy can do this.

share|improve this answer
It's $20 - the same price as the entire Mac OS X Mountain Lion! No way ... – DeepSpace101 Aug 20 '12 at 23:25

I'd say that you are looking for The Unarchiver. It's free in the Mac Appstore.

share|improve this answer
This just extracts the files - not a browser – Mark Jul 2 '11 at 17:46
The developer has recently released 'The Archive Browser' which offers these features. It's $4 in the App Store. – mockman Nov 11 '12 at 3:44

I know this thread is old, but to anyone looking for an answer; the best tool I have found is the B1 Free Archiver (

share|improve this answer
We look form more elaborated answers, please take some time to edit yours adding why you believe this tool is the best option to solve this need. – Thecafremo Jun 12 '13 at 11:06

Stuffit browses at least certain types of archives.

share|improve this answer

I think that BetterZip works great!

BetterZip allows you to:

Preview files in your archives without extracting or use Quick Look.

BetterZip's Window is:

Similar to the Finder it has a sidebar on the left side into which you can drop your favorite folders for archives, e.g., your downloads folder. The main file list in the center shows the contents of the archive and on the right side is a sidebar which can display a preview of the selected file.

share|improve this answer
While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. – Tony Williams Feb 9 '14 at 10:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.