Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Different is a question and answer site for power users of Apple hardware and software. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Using Finder, I have mounted an SMB share which resides on my NAS . When I use the mount command, the NAS is listed with the name it advertises (nas-smb).

mbp:~ me$ mount
/dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse)
map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse)
map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse)
//me@nas-smb._smb._tcp.local/myshare on /Volumes/myshare (smbfs, nodev, nosuid, mounted by me)

Edit: Is there a way to translate this to the IP address of the NAS or otherwise learn this information? Is there any way to find out the IP address of the NAS which is used to mount this share?

The tricky part is that my NAS can be reached on two different IP addresses (direct wired 1Gbps and wireless through my router).

On different sessions from the transfer speeds alone I have concluded that either of the IP addresses were in use. So I can't definitely tell to which of the two addresses I am connected for the SMB sharing.

The host command didn't works only with the wireless interface. I have also tried lsof -i -n but it shows no SMB related connections.

I hoped that smbutil lookup nas-smb could tell me what I want, but it doesn't. When the speeds show that the wired interface is in use, it still returns the address of the wireless interface.

Thanks!

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Since it is advertising its presence on the network with Bonjour, you should be able to simply ping it:

ping -c 1 nas-smb.local
share|improve this answer
    
This does work after all! Just make sure you don't omit the .local part! (Like I did when I first tried it.) –  m000 Mar 30 '11 at 20:05
add comment

I had problem of finding IP of maching which is not even behind NAT. Finder shows the name Bonjour Exporer and ping does not resolve it. Finally smbutil lookup <name> worked for me.

share|improve this answer
    
The OP explicitly stated that smbutil lookup didn't work for him. Are you using it differently and if yes, how? –  patrix Sep 17 '12 at 8:03
    
Even if the OP can't use this answer - perhaps it will confirm for others to re-try the smbutil or perhaps all the factors in making the problem are not common for all people. (the problem is something unrelated perhaps) –  bmike Sep 25 '12 at 18:59
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.